As though ants don’t have the munchies badly enough as it is. Better lock up your Twizzlers tonight.
Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous You’ll Be Waiting for a While | I Love My Kids. And Also Playboy Next »
The Ants Go Marching Two by . . . Wait, I Lost Count
» See all 53 comments
Leave a Reply
-
If This Tat Could Talk
Biscuits-72 on Sexy Body: Ruined mom2mla on Ass: Ruined Jovndøyr on Keep it in Your Magazines Kinseth on Do I Have Enough Piercings to … kindness on Keep it in Your Magazines Ry on Sexy Body: Ruined Jovndøyr on Straight From the Hood Jovndøyr on Glow Worms? Jovndøyr on Sexy Body: Ruined AL on Played in the Key of Razor…
wtf? a male navel piercing? apparently i’ve led a sheltered life.
My first reaction too: guy with a belly button piercing? EWWwwwww!
^THis
My male bestie and I got our navel piercings done at the same time. It was super fun!
A friend of mine got his in 1997 (at 22 years of age). He hasn’t got it any more, though.
Friend of mine got one in the late 90s too. It was really popular then and I remember thinking how cool it was.
Weird. The only males I’ve ever seen with navel piercings (other than one drag queen) have been recently and on younger guys.
That’s actually quite cool. However, when this dude is 80, it’ll look like a line of sewage.
Wow, that didn’t take long at all.
Haha!
Wait, I got this… and he’ll give a sh!t why?
Get it….
Christ I need coffee.
Haven’t we established the fact that when we’re all 80, all of our bodes will look like sh&t? So who cares?
I wonder if he has a love for carpenter ants or just needed anything at all to tone down the pot leaf idea.
They’re supposed to be leaf cutters but their mandibles look more like rhinocerous horns than what probably was intended.
Thinking deeper into this, having leaf cutter ants which remove the big leaves from weed stalks would be beneficial to all. Just leave me the sticky buds, ants.
Leaf cutters, of course. Now I remember that from the trip to the zoo. But good idea there Anna…Harvest Helper ants will probably be on sale soon at the local hydroponics shop.
I actually think it’s cute, except for the pot leaf, which makes him look like a douche, of course.
Same here.
I don’t get the “pot leaf = douche” assumption. Someone who gets a fairly creative dope-themed tattoo is obviously a dedicated stoner. And stoners tend to be too high most of the time to make the necessary effort to be douches.
No effort is required; stoners are automatically accorded Douche status by virtue of the very fact that they’re stoners. For God’s sake, man, read the International Douche Society guidelines – they gotta be available via Google Books by now.
I just checked it for you. It’s in Section VIII; Subsection f.) under “Members of Society with no Value” immediately following the entry: “Politicians.”
I see why I missed it. Naturally it’s alphabetised and you found it under P for Potheads. I was looking under S for Stoners – right after Santorum, Rick.
And Snooki, of course.
“Members of Society with no Value”? Some of the greatest figures in recent cultural history smoked herbs. Let me know when you write a song as good as “A Day in the Life.”
I think what’s annoying about stoners is that they really aren’t “mellow” and “chill” as they think they are, they actually take themselves way too seriously and are constantly politicizing their hobby.
I’ve smoked weed once and it didn’t do anything for me. While there’s nothing inherently screaming “douche” about smoking marijuana, self-proclaimed stoners, as well as just about self-proclaimed anything, have always annoyed me.
There’s a big difference between stoners and marijuana activists. Stoners couldn’t politicize their ass, let along anything else. They are seriously high just about all the time, which makes it difficult to proclaim anything. That’s not annoying, just kind of sad. Like any hobby, too much obsession doesn’t make for a balanced life.
Anyone who makes one thing, and particularly a drug, the main focus of their life and their defining characteristic is a douche in my book. I don’t find stoners to be chill, either, Sanginivore–I find them annoying and dull. Just like smoking weed.
Indica and predominantly-indica hybrids are the ones which produce the dulling effect. C. sativa is the one some refer to as the thinking man’s bud, as it tends to make one more reflective (or, as it were, chill). I don’t indulge very often, but when I do, I do my best to look for signs of which species or near hybrid is favourable to me. I can’t tolerate indica and sativa is the only thing that can calm me down when I’m extremely manic. Unfortunately, even the few FDA-approved medications derived from Cannabis do not discern between species/varietals, and in my home state and county, even those are not allowed.
/end overly-analytical response
For what it’s worth, I do not care much for stoners (as others have stated, the ones who care more for weed than anything else in life). Just try auditioning performance musicians some time, much less finding any who want to some day tour that will show up for practice consistently.
Bob, there’s a difference between people who smoke weed occasionally and ‘stoners’.
Calling it ‘herb’ makes you sound 12, unless you’re Jamaican then it just sounds tacky.
There you go….
Puts all the over-produced, condescending Beatles-at-their-worst to shames. It’s the difference between “Eleanor Rigby” and Fats domino’s “Blue Monday”.
**sigh** referring Bob’s comment.
Douches for Dummies?
I thought the same. At first I thought maybe this is some kind of world traveler, (hey, it can happen), and then I got to the pot leaf. *Douche Swoosh*
“Daddy, Daddy – why do we have such malformed funiculi?”
.
.”Like, shut up and eat your leaf, little dude.”
Just out of shot there’s the poor unfortunate ant who accidentally picked up a salvia leaf.
Poor little guy is blitzed out of his antennae, freaking out because he thinks he’s drowning.
That would be S. indica then. That’s the species known for causing couch lock and paranoia.
DTMB: I had to look up “funiculi” because of the silly song, and because I thought the plural of funiculus was funiculae. I was wrong. It’s either funicules or funiculi. Now I can’t get that stupid song out of my head, and the word “funicles” makes me giggle and think “Great, as soon as some young boy sees that word, he’s going to create an entry on UD, stating that it’s a new addition to the ever-growing list of euphemisms for penïs.”
I was thinking more Divinorum. It’s not so much paranoia or couch lock I was thinking, it was more existentialist terror brought on by a bad trip.
I have never found, to my knowledge, any Divinorum. I’ll have to research details on that species. I can identify the others by their leaves and seeds, except when it’s a hybrid too close to being 50/50.
I had to look up “funiculi” because of the silly song, and because I thought the plural of funiculus was funiculae. I was wrong. It’s either funicules or funiculi.
.
Second declension “-us” nouns are annoying, including the irregulars which “end” in vowels (i.e. “e-us” as in “Deus). There’s an old doggerel verse (by Richard Bentley, I think) somewhere in the back of my head about them – “The vocative’s just like nominative, in the singular and plural; except in the second declension “-us ” where the rules are very rural; vocative singulars when in Rome, on the streets and roads and vias, were not the same as when in church, where “Dea” ends up “Deus.” In early mediæval ‘vus’ and ‘quus’ and ‘vum’ take ‘o’ not ‘u,” Except from the Greek, where their regular streak just ends at the singular, too.”
My head asploded. Oddly enough, considering my previously having studied medicine and chemistry, I never studied Latin.
Oh shoot, I remember everything I ever learned about the Sciences – if it wiggles, it’s biology; if it goes “BANG” it’s chemistry; if it doesn’t work, it’s physics, and if it’s incomprehensible, it’s mathematics.
I like it…except for the pot leaf.
I like it despite the pot leaf. It’s a cute, original, well executed tattoo. I don’t think putting illicit drug references on your body is ever a good idea, that being said, it’s easy to cover. Well done, navel-bedazzled burn out, well done!
Drug tattoos are awkward even when it’s a licit one, like tobacco. It’s a pity. I also think this tattoo is cute.
It is… not horrible. Except for the shadows, whick look uncannily like what my cats leave in their kitty litter box after a big meal.
Okay, poll time: What do we think is worse: a pot leaf tattoo, or a Pabst Blue Ribbon tattoo? Discuss.
The ducklips barbie tat blonde in the bikini with a joint drinking a Pabst.
Oh, now I’ll have to think of a new idea for my next tattoo. Why oh why are all the good ideas taken?
Gut reaction says PBR. I think it’s because marijuana connects to a wider range of subcultures, whereas a PBR tattoo basically covers two: hipsters and rednecks. While stoners are, as you said, annoying and dull, I generally don’t find them as viscerally obnoxious as hipsters.
^Exactly what she said. Thank you, carn!
*he, actually
. I’m quite aware that I rarely (if ever) divulge details about myself, though, so it’s understandable. I suppose the random purplish-red pattern doesn’t help, either.
My apologies! I must have mixed up your name with someone from before. Also, like the other male regulars here, you’re not a douche.
Ha, this is actually kind of fun. One of the more creative stoner tattoos I’ve seen. Not that it was a good idea…
Antsy, no! The ravenous munchies caused by your leaf will result in the deaths of millions of creatures, devoured by waves of blunt-smoking army ants!
Oh, it’s medicinal, you say? Carry on, then.